Guerre and Shalom

Guerre and Shalom

The Genocide of Truth

Politicians, Sophistry and The Genocide Lie

“Words had to change their ordinary meaning.”

Daniel Clarke-Serret's avatar
Daniel Clarke-Serret
Sep 02, 2026
∙ Paid

Help us end The Great Genocide Blood Libel today. Sign up as paid to Guerre and Shalom and read/spread this important work.

THE GENOCIDE OF TRUTH: Twenty Roots of a Modern Blood Libel

by Daniel Clarke-Serret

Introduction: The Genocide of Truth

Chapter 1: Truth // Chapter 2: Ideology // Chapter 3: Religion // Chapter 4: Science // Chapter 5: Attention // Chapter 6: Distraction // Chapter 7: (True) Expertise // Chapter 8: Authority // Chapter 9: Declaration // Chapter 10: Confusion // Chapter 11: Conversation // Chapters 12 and 13 below.

Chapter 12: Democratisation

Democratisation: An Inflation of Untruth

Democratisation: An Inflation of Untruth

Daniel Clarke-Serret
·
Feb 9
Read full story

Chapter 13: Sophistry

The Descent of Politics

“Words had to change their ordinary meaning”

Book 3, Chapter 82 of Thucydides’ History of the Peloponnesian War

Keir Starmer delivers a statement outside 10 Downing Street ahead of the arrival of new Prime Minister Andy Burnham in July (PA)

The past is not a foreign country. We are living “the past” as we speak. For no work emerges in a vacuum and no inspiration is absent of context. We live in the era of The Great Genocide Blood Libel, the most pernicious abomination of our age. The claim that civilian war dead amounts to extermination. The claim that Israel, with its advanced weaponry and precision technology, is incapable of doing to civilians in two years what any competent military power could do in two days. It’s an affront to common sense; an offensive joke. But it’s an old joke, a tried and tested affront to obviousness that has been with us throughout recorded history. And speaking of history, let’s turn to its founding father: Thucydides.

To reference the famous Greek in his history of the Peloponnesian War, words change their meaning. In his case “reckless audacity” came to be “courage of a loyal ally”, “prudent hesitation” was rebranded as “specious cowardice” and the “ability to see all sides of a question” was deemed “inaptness to act on any”. Oh how little has changed! For it was as true then in the civil war at Corcyra as it is now in the non-existence genocide in Gaza.

User's avatar

Continue reading this post for free, courtesy of Daniel Clarke-Serret.

Or purchase a paid subscription.
© 2026 Daniel Clarke-Serret · Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start your SubstackGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture